Mahadev Balasaheb Bokade vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 172/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHSO010005532026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
343/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
172/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
Akalkot South
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahadev Balasaheb Bokade
Adv. Pujari Prajakta Shavrsidha
Balasaheb Sidram Bokade
Adv. Pujari Prajakta Shavrsidha
Tanuja Mahadev Bokade
Adv. Adv.Prajkta Shawarsidha Pujari
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 172/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to applicants Mahadev Balasaheb Bokade and Balasaheb Sidram Bokade, but rejected bail for applicant Tanuja Mahadev Bokade. The court found that while family rivalry existed between parties over disputed agricultural land, applicants No.1 and 2 faced only assault charges with no recovery-related allegations, whereas applicant No.3's custody was deemed essential for recovery of an allegedly stolen gold mangalsutra (10 gms). Both applicants granted bail were released on Rs.25,000 PR bonds with stringent conditions including weekly police reporting and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 172/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to applicants Mahadev Balasaheb Bokade and Balasaheb Sidram Bokade, but rejected bail for applicant Tanuja Mahadev Bokade. The court found that while family rivalry existed between parties over disputed agricultural land, applicants No.1 and 2 faced only assault charges with no recovery-related allegations, whereas applicant No.3's custody was deemed essential for recovery of an allegedly stolen gold mangalsutra (10 gms). Both applicants granted bail were released on Rs.25,000 PR bonds with stringent conditions including weekly police reporting and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts