Virswami Rangappa Tupdale vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 165/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 31st March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHSO010005462026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
337/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
165/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
236
Police Station
Faujdar Chawadi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Virswami Rangappa Tupdale
Adv. Matre Rajkumar Siddharam
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Virswami Rangappa Tupdale v. State of Maharashtra Decision: The court rejected the applicant's bail application. The judge found prima facie evidence of the applicant's active involvement in serious crimes including fraudulent marriage through false employment claims, illegal dowry demands, physical assault, and attempted murder of one daughter. Reasoning: While the applicant claimed false implication and innocence, the court determined that the serious nature of the offenses, ongoing investigation, and substantial risk of witness intimidation, absconding, and non-cooperation warranted continued detention pending investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Virswami Rangappa Tupdale v. State of Maharashtra Decision: The court rejected the applicant's bail application. The judge found prima facie evidence of the applicant's active involvement in serious crimes including fraudulent marriage through false employment claims, illegal dowry demands, physical assault, and attempted murder of one daughter. Reasoning: While the applicant claimed false implication and innocence, the court determined that the serious nature of the offenses, ongoing investigation, and substantial risk of witness intimidation, absconding, and non-cooperation warranted continued detention pending investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts