Vivekanand Panchayya Swami vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 164/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 31st March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHSO010005412026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
333/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
164/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0038
Police Station
Mandrup
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vivekanand Panchayya Swami
Adv. Gunde Manoj Nagnath
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Vivekanand Panchayya Swami vs. State of Maharashtra Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application. Key Reasoning: The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant continuously harassed the deceased (Akshata) through repeated calls, messages, and photographs, creating psychological pressure that led to her suicide on 18/11/2025. The court determined the applicant had clear involvement in instigating, aiding, and abetting the suicide through continuous harassment. Critical evidence (the applicant's mobile phone) remained unrecovered, and the applicant was absconding, creating risks of witness intimidation and evidence tampering if released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Vivekanand Panchayya Swami vs. State of Maharashtra Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application. Key Reasoning: The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant continuously harassed the deceased (Akshata) through repeated calls, messages, and photographs, creating psychological pressure that led to her suicide on 18/11/2025. The court determined the applicant had clear involvement in instigating, aiding, and abetting the suicide through continuous harassment. Critical evidence (the applicant's mobile phone) remained unrecovered, and the applicant was absconding, creating risks of witness intimidation and evidence tampering if released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts