Ramchandra alias Nana Nagnath Jadhav vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 144/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(2),115(2),352,351(2)(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHSO010004772026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

293/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

144/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Solapur

Judge

6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

Kamati

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(2),115(2),352,351(2)(3),3(5)
Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1)(r)(s),3(2)(va)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramchandra alias Nana Nagnath Jadhav

    Adv. Waghmare A.L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Cri.B.A. No. 144/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur allowed Ramchandra's bail application. The applicant was arrested for offences under BNS sections 118(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2)(3), 3(5) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va), arising from an incident involving assault with an iron rod and alleged casteist abuse. Key Reasoning: The court found that investigation was nearing completion, the weapon had been recovered, and no purpose would be served by continued detention. The court noted ambiguity regarding which accused made which statements and that the informant failed to mention the applicant's caste in the FIR. Order: Bail granted on Rs. 15,000 personal and surety bond, with conditions that the applicant not commit future offences or pressurize/intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  8. 27-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  9. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  10. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  11. 20-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  12. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  13. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  14. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge

  15. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  16. 05-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  17. 02-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge

  18. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 144/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri.B.A. No. 144/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur allowed Ramchandra's bail application. The applicant was arrested for offences under BNS sections 118(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2)(3), 3(5) and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va), arising from an incident involving assault with an iron rod and alleged casteist abuse. Key Reasoning: The court found that investigation was nearing completion, the weapon had been recovered, and no purpose would be served by continued detention. The court noted ambiguity regarding which accused made which statements and that the informant failed to mention the applicant's caste in the FIR. Order: Bail granted on Rs. 15,000 personal and surety bond, with conditions that the applicant not commit future offences or pressurize/intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case