Appasaheb alias Appasha Bandichode vs The State Of Maharashtra Through-D.G.P. Solapur — 9/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 21st April 2026.
Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: MHSO010004492025
e-Filing Number
04-02-2025
Filing Number
288/2025
Filing Date
05-02-2025
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
07-02-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Appasaheb alias Appasha Bandichode
Adv. Kulkarni Prakash Anantrao
Mallikarjun alias Kumar Bandichode
Kashibai Appasha Bandichode
Kallappa Yallappa Bandichode
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra Through-D.G.P. Solapur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 09/2025 Court Decision: The Sessions Judge acquitted all four appellants of charges under IPC Sections 325 and 323 (causing grievous and simple hurt), finding material discrepancies in witness testimony, procedural irregularities, and insufficient corroborating medical evidence to sustain conviction beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court identified serious gaps in the prosecution's case, including contradictory eyewitness accounts regarding who arrived at the incident scene, admissions that the FIR was filed after deliberation to "teach a lesson" to the accused, failure to examine independent witnesses despite 20-25 people present, and a doctor's admission that the injuries could have resulted from a motorcycle fall rather than assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 09/2025 Court Decision: The Sessions Judge acquitted all four appellants of charges under IPC Sections 325 and 323 (causing grievous and simple hurt), finding material discrepancies in witness testimony, procedural irregularities, and insufficient corroborating medical evidence to sustain conviction beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court identified serious gaps in the prosecution's case, including contradictory eyewitness accounts regarding who arrived at the incident scene, admissions that the FIR was filed after deliberation to "teach a lesson" to the accused, failure to examine independent witnesses despite 20-25 people present, and a doctor's admission that the injuries could have resulted from a motorcycle fall rather than assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts