Shivappa Rudrappa Pujari vs The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 125/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHSO010004142026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
250/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
125/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0035
Police Station
Akalkot South
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivappa Rudrappa Pujari
Adv. Wagh Shivratna Arjun
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra-Through D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 31-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shivappa Rudrappa Pujari v. State (125/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur allowed the anticipatory bail application of Shivappa Rudrappa Pujari, charged under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and assault provisions. The court found the incident was a sudden quarrel without deliberate caste-based insult, the weapon was already seized, investigation was nearly complete, and no evidence tampering risk existed, warranting release on Rs. 15,000 personal and surety bond with conditions against witness intimidation and future offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Shivappa Rudrappa Pujari v. State (125/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur allowed the anticipatory bail application of Shivappa Rudrappa Pujari, charged under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and assault provisions. The court found the incident was a sudden quarrel without deliberate caste-based insult, the weapon was already seized, investigation was nearly complete, and no evidence tampering risk existed, warranting release on Rs. 15,000 personal and surety bond with conditions against witness intimidation and future offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts