Amol Alias Vishal Shankar Pawar vs The State Of Maharashtra Through-D.G.P. Solapur — 115/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 13th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHSO010003822026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

229/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

115/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Solapur

Judge

4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1075

Police Station

Mohol

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(2),127(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Amol Alias Vishal Shankar Pawar

Adv. Rathod Tarasing P.

Respondent(s)

The State Of Maharashtra Through-D.G.P. Solapur

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge

13-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Arguments

09-03-2026

Arguments

06-03-2026

Arguments

05-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted regular bail to Amol @ Vishal Shankar Pawar in a robbery case (Crime No.1075/2025) involving charges under Sections 310(2), 127(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court held that since the investigation was complete and charge-sheet filed, prior grounds for detention no longer existed, and criminal antecedents alone cannot justify bail denial. The applicant was enlarged on a PR bond of Rs.25,000 with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, cooperation with investigation, and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to Amol @ Vishal Shankar Pawar in a robbery case (Crime No.1075/2025) involving charges under Sections 310(2), 127(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court held that since the investigation was complete and charge-sheet filed, prior grounds for detention no longer existed, and criminal antecedents alone cannot justify bail denial. The applicant was enlarged on a PR bond of Rs.25,000 with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, cooperation with investigation, and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Solapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case