Amol Alias Vishal Shankar Pawar vs The State Of Maharashtra Through-D.G.P. Solapur — 115/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHSO010003822026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
229/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
115/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1075
Police Station
Mohol
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amol Alias Vishal Shankar Pawar
Adv. Rathod Tarasing P.
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra Through-D.G.P. Solapur
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and Additional Session Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted regular bail to Amol @ Vishal Shankar Pawar in a robbery case (Crime No.1075/2025) involving charges under Sections 310(2), 127(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court held that since the investigation was complete and charge-sheet filed, prior grounds for detention no longer existed, and criminal antecedents alone cannot justify bail denial. The applicant was enlarged on a PR bond of Rs.25,000 with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, cooperation with investigation, and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted regular bail to Amol @ Vishal Shankar Pawar in a robbery case (Crime No.1075/2025) involving charges under Sections 310(2), 127(2), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court held that since the investigation was complete and charge-sheet filed, prior grounds for detention no longer existed, and criminal antecedents alone cannot justify bail denial. The applicant was enlarged on a PR bond of Rs.25,000 with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, cooperation with investigation, and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts