Kumar Kondiba Thavare vs The State Of Maharashtra Through-D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 36/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHSO010001172026
e-Filing Number
12-01-2026
Filing Number
71/2026
Filing Date
12-01-2026
Registration No
36/2026
Registration Date
12-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
Mohol
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kumar Kondiba Thavare
Adv. Babre Manish Mangesh
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra Through-D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 31-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur granted anticipatory bail to Kumar Kondiba Thavare in charges under the SC/ST Atrocities Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found no prima facie case against him because: (1) the alleged incident occurred on 05/08/2025 but the FIR was filed belatedly on 03/01/2026 without explanation; (2) the applicant's name was not mentioned in the report; (3) the informant and applicant had filed competing cases against each other, suggesting the report may be retaliatory. The court concluded investigation was nearly complete, nothing needed recovery, and bail conditions imposed require the applicant not commit offenses or intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur granted anticipatory bail to Kumar Kondiba Thavare in charges under the SC/ST Atrocities Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found no prima facie case against him because: (1) the alleged incident occurred on 05/08/2025 but the FIR was filed belatedly on 03/01/2026 without explanation; (2) the applicant's name was not mentioned in the report; (3) the informant and applicant had filed competing cases against each other, suggesting the report may be retaliatory. The court concluded investigation was nearly complete, nothing needed recovery, and bail conditions imposed require the applicant not commit offenses or intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts