Komal Kumar Thavare Alias Swati Machindra Gund vs The State Of Maharashtra Through-D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput — 35/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 31st March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHSO010001162026
e-Filing Number
12-01-2026
Filing Number
70/2026
Filing Date
12-01-2026
Registration No
35/2026
Registration Date
12-01-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
Mohol
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Komal Kumar Thavare Alias Swati Machindra Gund
Adv. Babre Manish Mangesh
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra Through-D.G.P. Solapur Advocate - DGP P.M.Rajput
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Komal Kumar Thavare @ Swati Machindra Gund v. State of Maharashtra Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the applicant. The court found prima facie insufficient evidence, noting that the applicant lacked intentional caste abusals and had no role in one incident, while repeated allegations violated Article 20(2) of the Constitution. Bail Conditions: Release on personal and surety bonds of Rs. 20,000 each, with conditions prohibiting witness intimidation and future offences under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Komal Kumar Thavare @ Swati Machindra Gund v. State of Maharashtra Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the applicant. The court found prima facie insufficient evidence, noting that the applicant lacked intentional caste abusals and had no role in one incident, while repeated allegations violated Article 20(2) of the Constitution. Bail Conditions: Release on personal and surety bonds of Rs. 20,000 each, with conditions prohibiting witness intimidation and future offences under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts