The State of Maharashtra vs Kalidas Dattu @ Dattatray Barbole etc- — 10/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354(A),451,506. Status: Formal Hearing. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHSO010000692024
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
39/2024
Filing Date
06-01-2024
Registration No
10/2024
Registration Date
09-01-2024
Court
District and Session Court , Solapur
Judge
6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
799
Police Station
Mohol
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP P.M. Rajput
Respondent(s)
Kalidas Dattu @ Dattatray Barbole etc-
Jalindar Dattatray Barbole
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Adhoc District Judge-1 and Additional Session Judge
Formal Hearing
Formal Hearing
Formal Hearing
Formal Hearing
Formal Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Formal Hearing |
| 27-04-2026 | Formal Hearing |
| 24-04-2026 | Formal Hearing |
| 22-04-2026 | Formal Hearing |
| 21-04-2026 | Formal Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Special Case No. 10/2024 Outcome: The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur granted bail to accused Jalindar Dattatray Barbole. The court allowed his regular bail application and confirmed the interim bail order dated 19/01/2026 as per its terms and conditions. Key Reasoning: The judge found the prosecution's case weak due to: a three-day delay in lodging the complaint without explanation (making the report doubtful), the applicant's name not being mentioned in the charge sheet, no material evidence to recover, and absence of intent to humiliate being documented. The court noted investigation was complete and keeping him detained indefinitely would cause societal humiliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Special Case No. 10/2024 Outcome: The Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur granted bail to accused Jalindar Dattatray Barbole. The court allowed his regular bail application and confirmed the interim bail order dated 19/01/2026 as per its terms and conditions. Key Reasoning: The judge found the prosecution's case weak due to: a three-day delay in lodging the complaint without explanation (making the report doubtful), the applicant's name not being mentioned in the charge sheet, no material evidence to recover, and absence of intent to humiliate being documented. The court noted investigation was complete and keeping him detained indefinitely would cause societal humiliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts