State of Maharashtra vs Gopichand Kundalik Padalkar etc.1 Advocate - Jadhav Ajinkya Subhash — 288/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,447,34,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHSN170048812020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1102/2024
Filing Date
05-02-2024
Registration No
288/2024
Registration Date
05-02-2024
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vita
Judge
2-Adhoc District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
Atpadi
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A P P
Respondent(s)
Gopichand Kundalik Padalkar etc.1 Advocate - Jadhav Ajinkya Subhash
Brahamdev Kundik Padalkar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Adhoc District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 21-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 03-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Vita acquitted two defendants (Gopichand Kundlik Padalkar and Brahmadev Kundlik Padalkar) of charges under the Atrocities (Prevention) Act 2015 on March 7, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence that the defendants unlawfully dispossessed a scheduled caste complainant of agricultural land and a water well through fraudulent property transactions conducted between 2008-2011, concluding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge at Vita acquitted two defendants (Gopichand Kundlik Padalkar and Brahmadev Kundlik Padalkar) of charges under the Atrocities (Prevention) Act 2015 on March 7, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence that the defendants unlawfully dispossessed a scheduled caste complainant of agricultural land and a water well through fraudulent property transactions conducted between 2008-2011, concluding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts