Sumitra Prakash Patil vs Mangal Uttam Bhadule Advocate - Karajgar Shreekant Dhondiram — 231/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96O41. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Ready Next hearing 20-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHSN170013312020

Filing Number

231/2024

Filing Date

05-Feb-2024

Registration No

231/2024

Registration Date

05-Feb-2024

Court

District and Additional Sessions Court, Vita

Judge

1-District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96O41

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sumitra Prakash Patil

    Adv. Kore Santosh Vitthal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mangal Uttam Bhadule Advocate - Karajgar Shreekant Dhondiram

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 03-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: Application Exh.45 filed by the respondent to set aside a "no say" order was allowed. The respondent is permitted to file a reply to Application Exh.35, which sought to make a third person (tenant) a party to the property dispute proceedings. The court allowed the application without prejudice to any party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 03-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  6. 01-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 20-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  8. 02-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  9. 05-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  10. 19-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  11. 15-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  12. 18-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  13. 16-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  14. 25-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  15. 04-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  16. 03-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  17. 02-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  18. 10-May-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

  19. 30-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 05-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 231/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Application Exh.45 filed by the respondent to set aside a "no say" order was allowed. The respondent is permitted to file a reply to Application Exh.35, which sought to make a third person (tenant) a party to the property dispute proceedings. The court allowed the application without prejudice to any party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case