Varsha Laxman Mohite vs Vimal Shankar Nalavade — 101/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O43,R1. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHSN170010672025
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
09-12-2025
Filing Number
686/2025
Filing Date
11-12-2025
Registration No
101/2025
Registration Date
11-12-2025
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vita
Judge
2-Adhoc District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Varsha Laxman Mohite
Adv. KUMBHAR VISHAL BASAPPA
Aasha Netaji Fadtare
Adv. KUMBHAR VISHAL BASAPPA
Respondent(s)
Vimal Shankar Nalavade
Dhanajay Shankar Nalavade
Vikram Shankar Nalavade
Ashwini Vikram Nalavade
Vasanti Bhagwan Nalavade
Vijay Bhagwan Nalavade
Kusum Yashwant Nalavade
Pranav Yashwant Nalavade
Mitali Yashwant Nalavade
Santosh Gajanan Nalavade
Special Recovery Officer,
Chairman,
Branch Manager,
Branch Manager, Bapusaheb Yesugade gramin Bigarsheti pathsanstha
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Adhoc District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 20-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 13-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 30-01-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Interim Orders
Summary The court rejected the appellants' prayer for a status quo order to stop the auction procedure initiated by the Recovery Officer, finding no substance in their submission under Section 41 of the Specific Relief Act 1963. The court noted that the appellants failed to demonstrate what steps they had taken after receiving notice from the Mandal Adhikari and did not establish prima facie grounds for the relief sought. The matter has been adjourned to 09.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the appellants' prayer for a status quo order to stop the auction procedure initiated by the Recovery Officer, finding no substance in their submission under Section 41 of the Specific Relief Act 1963. The court noted that the appellants failed to demonstrate what steps they had taken after receiving notice from the Mandal Adhikari and did not establish prima facie grounds for the relief sought. The matter has been adjourned to 09.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts