State of Maharashtra vs Sachin Ramchandra Yadav Advocate - Bavchikar Umesh Kallappa — 47/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2),64(2)(F).64(2)(J),64(2)(M),65(2),351(2),351(3). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHSN170007302025
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
342/2025
Filing Date
17-07-2025
Registration No
47/2025
Registration Date
17-07-2025
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vita
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
81
Police Station
Palus
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Gramopadhye Makarand Hanmant
Respondent(s)
Sachin Ramchandra Yadav Advocate - Bavchikar Umesh Kallappa
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 13-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 23-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 26-12-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The bail application of Sachin Ramchandra Yadav, accused of sexually abusing his 10-year-old daughter under BNS sections 64(2), 65(2), 351(2), 351(3) and POCSO Act sections 4(2), 5(l), 5(m), 5(n), 6, 8, 10, was rejected and dismissed. The Additional Sessions Judge found sufficient evidence including medical findings of physical injuries, nail scratches, and consistent statements from the victim and informant under section 183 BNSS, and considered the grave nature of the offense, tender age of the victim, and risk of witness tampering as grounds to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The bail application of Sachin Ramchandra Yadav, accused of sexually abusing his 10-year-old daughter under BNS sections 64(2), 65(2), 351(2), 351(3) and POCSO Act sections 4(2), 5(l), 5(m), 5(n), 6, 8, 10, was rejected and dismissed. The Additional Sessions Judge found sufficient evidence including medical findings of physical injuries, nail scratches, and consistent statements from the victim and informant under section 183 BNSS, and considered the grave nature of the offense, tender age of the victim, and risk of witness tampering as grounds to deny bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts