State of Maharashtra vs Dhairyashil Siddheshwar Swami — 375/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,376(2)(n),109,34,. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHSN170006452024
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1370/2024
Filing Date
07-06-2024
Registration No
375/2024
Registration Date
07-06-2024
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vita
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
158
Police Station
Vita
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. DGP
Respondent(s)
Dhairyashil Siddheshwar Swami
Ramprasad Haridas Parchake
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 17-12-2025 | Charge | |
| 18-09-2025 | Charge | |
| 17-07-2025 | Hearing | |
| 23-04-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY Bail granted to accused Dhairyasheel Siddheshwar Swami in a rape case (IPC §376, §376(2)(n) and POCSO Act §4, 5(l), 6). The court found the victim, aged 17 years 6 months, was mature enough to understand consequences of her acts, had consensual relations with the accused, delayed reporting, and voluntarily visited the hotel twice, supporting a consensual relationship narrative. Bail was approved on a PR bond of Rs.50,000/- with standard conditions including no witness tampering and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY Bail granted to accused Dhairyasheel Siddheshwar Swami in a rape case (IPC §376, §376(2)(n) and POCSO Act §4, 5(l), 6). The court found the victim, aged 17 years 6 months, was mature enough to understand consequences of her acts, had consensual relations with the accused, delayed reporting, and voluntarily visited the hotel twice, supporting a consensual relationship narrative. Bail was approved on a PR bond of Rs.50,000/- with standard conditions including no witness tampering and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts