State of Maharashtra vs Dhairyashil Siddheshwar Swami — 375/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,376(2)(n),109,34,. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHSN170006452024

Charge

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1370/2024

Filing Date

07-06-2024

Registration No

375/2024

Registration Date

07-06-2024

Court

District and Additional Sessions Court, Vita

Judge

1-District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

FIR Details

FIR Number

158

Police Station

Vita

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 376,376(2)(n),109,34,
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,5(L),5(j)(2),6,17,

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. DGP

Respondent(s)

Dhairyashil Siddheshwar Swami

Ramprasad Haridas Parchake

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge

07-03-2026

Charge

17-12-2025

Charge

18-09-2025

Charge

17-07-2025

Hearing

23-04-2025

Hearing

Interim Orders

12-07-2024
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY Bail granted to accused Dhairyasheel Siddheshwar Swami in a rape case (IPC §376, §376(2)(n) and POCSO Act §4, 5(l), 6). The court found the victim, aged 17 years 6 months, was mature enough to understand consequences of her acts, had consensual relations with the accused, delayed reporting, and voluntarily visited the hotel twice, supporting a consensual relationship narrative. Bail was approved on a PR bond of Rs.50,000/- with standard conditions including no witness tampering and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY Bail granted to accused Dhairyasheel Siddheshwar Swami in a rape case (IPC §376, §376(2)(n) and POCSO Act §4, 5(l), 6). The court found the victim, aged 17 years 6 months, was mature enough to understand consequences of her acts, had consensual relations with the accused, delayed reporting, and voluntarily visited the hotel twice, supporting a consensual relationship narrative. Bail was approved on a PR bond of Rs.50,000/- with standard conditions including no witness tampering and regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Additional Sessions Court, Vita All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case