RAJENDRA BHAGWAN SHELAKE vs AMIT RAJENDRA SHELAKE — 42/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O43,R1,2,. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHSN170005242025
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
e-Filing Number
03-05-2025
Filing Number
375/2025
Filing Date
06-05-2025
Registration No
42/2025
Registration Date
06-05-2025
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vita
Judge
2-Adhoc District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJENDRA BHAGWAN SHELAKE
Adv. KORE SANTOSH VITTHAL
DEVANAND RAJENDRA SHELAKE
Adv. KORE SANTOSH VITTHAL
AMRUTA RAJENDRA SHELAKE
Adv. KORE SANTOSH VITTHAL
Respondent(s)
AMIT RAJENDRA SHELAKE
SHAKUNTALA RAJENDRA SHELAKE
JALINDAR BHAGWAN SHELAKE
GAJANAN BHAGWAN SHELAKE 5.
SANGITA SUBHASH SHELAKE 5.
SUDARSHAN SUBHASH SHELAKE
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Adhoc District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 28-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Misc. Civil Appeal No. 42/2025 (Rajendra B. Shelke vs. Amit R. Shelke), the Adhoc District Judge ordered the appeal to proceed without the say (reply) of respondent Nos. 1 and 2, who failed to file their response within the stipulated period despite appearing through advocate. The appeal was also ordered to proceed ex-parte against respondent Nos. 5a and 5b, who remained absent despite service of notices through N-step. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Misc. Civil Appeal No. 42/2025 (Rajendra B. Shelke vs. Amit R. Shelke), the Adhoc District Judge ordered the appeal to proceed without the say (reply) of respondent Nos. 1 and 2, who failed to file their response within the stipulated period despite appearing through advocate. The appeal was also ordered to proceed ex-parte against respondent Nos. 5a and 5b, who remained absent despite service of notices through N-step. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts