State of Maharashtra vs Rajaram Namdev Shinde Advocate - Shanbag Mahesh Sadanand — 9/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(2),118(1),119(2),126(2),324(2),3(5). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHSN170000922026
Filing Number
41/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
9/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vita
Judge
1-District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
171
Police Station
Chinchani-Wangi
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. Gramopadhye Makarand Hanmant
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajaram Namdev Shinde Advocate - Shanbag Mahesh Sadanand
-
2.Gajanan Namdev Shinde
Case History
-
16-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The application for return of property under Section 497 BNSS filed by accused Rajaram Namdev Shinde was allowed. The court ordered return of the seized Hero Honda Splendor Plus motorcycle (Reg. No. MH-10-AH-3537) to the registered owner upon execution of a Rs. 30,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that he shall not transfer or alter the vehicle and must produce it as required by court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge 1 and Additional Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2026
Summary: The application for return of property under Section 497 BNSS filed by accused Rajaram Namdev Shinde was allowed. The court ordered return of the seized Hero Honda Splendor Plus motorcycle (Reg. No. MH-10-AH-3537) to the registered owner upon execution of a Rs. 30,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that he shall not transfer or alter the vehicle and must produce it as required by court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts