Amit Annaso Nikam vs Mohan Bhagwan N ikam Advocate - Shinde Santosh Ramdas — 1579/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN150081232020
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3784/2020
Filing Date
15-12-2020
Registration No
1579/2020
Registration Date
15-12-2020
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Vita
Judge
2-Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amit Annaso Nikam
Adv. Dugam Sanjay Purushottam, Dugam Sanjay Purushottam
Sagar Annaso Nikam
Adv. Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Sarika Bhimrao Ghadge
Adv. Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Shashikala Annaso Nikam
Adv. Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Respondent(s)
Mohan Bhagwan N ikam Advocate - Shinde Santosh Ramdas
Savitri Bhagwan Nikam
Adv. Shinde Santosh Ramdas
Shivaji Aaba Nikam
Adv. Shinde Santosh Ramdas
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 28-08-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 04-07-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary The court granted an interim injunction order in favor of the plaintiff, restraining Defendant No. 1 from interfering with the plaintiff's equal shared possession and enjoyment of certain properties (Plot Nos. 78, 120, and 124). The court found a prima facie case in the plaintiff's favor regarding their ownership rights to these disputed properties and determined that the balance of convenience favored granting interim relief to prevent irreparable harm to the plaintiff's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted an interim injunction order in favor of the plaintiff, restraining Defendant No. 1 from interfering with the plaintiff's equal shared possession and enjoyment of certain properties (Plot Nos. 78, 120, and 124). The court found a prima facie case in the plaintiff's favor regarding their ownership rights to these disputed properties and determined that the balance of convenience favored granting interim relief to prevent irreparable harm to the plaintiff's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts