Ganapati Tukaram Patil - 4 vs Ananda Vithoba Patil - 2 Advocate - Hingmire Shailendra Rajaram — 708/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section PerpetualInjuction. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN150061592020
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2834/2020
Filing Date
15-12-2020
Registration No
708/2020
Registration Date
15-12-2020
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Vita
Judge
2-Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganapati Tukaram Patil - 4
Adv. Bhosale Pramod Dilip
Shahji Patil
Adv. Yadav Shishupal Parbati
Shankar patil
Bhagwan Patil
Adv. Yadav Shishupal Parbati
Jyotilram Patil
Respondent(s)
Ananda Vithoba Patil - 2 Advocate - Hingmire Shailendra Rajaram
Pandurang Patil
Adv. Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Shivaji Patil
Adv. Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 28-02-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 07-02-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 03-01-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 06-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Civil Suit No. 708/2020 under Section 114 CPC, the court ordered that the defendant file a reply/written statement within the stipulated timeframe. The court postponed further proceedings and directed the case to be reconvened on 17.01.2022 for the defendant to submit the required documents. The court emphasized that all legal arguments will be considered comprehensively before passing final judgment on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Civil Suit No. 708/2020 under Section 114 CPC, the court ordered that the defendant file a reply/written statement within the stipulated timeframe. The court postponed further proceedings and directed the case to be reconvened on 17.01.2022 for the defendant to submit the required documents. The court emphasized that all legal arguments will be considered comprehensively before passing final judgment on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts