Nivrutii Awgade vs Shankar Mane Advocate - Marle Nisha Rahul — 532/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 0. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN150055692020

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

02nd May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2557/2020

Filing Date

15-12-2020

Registration No

532/2020

Registration Date

15-12-2020

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Vita

Judge

3-2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 0

Petitioner(s)

Nivrutii Awgade

Adv. Pawar Himmatrao Akaram

Respondent(s)

Shankar Mane Advocate - Marle Nisha Rahul

Pandharinath mane

Dipak Mane

Santosh Mane

Shakuntala Mane

Bhimrao Yadav

Subrao yadav

Nilawati khavale

Nandatai Kamble

Shahaji jadhav

Keshav Jadhav

Adv. Marle Nisha Rahul

Mahadev Jadhav

Adv. Marle Nisha Rahul

Raosaheb Jadhav

Adv. Marle Nisha Rahul

Manjula Jadhav

Jagubai Jadhav

Ranjitshing Thorat

Adv. Pawar Suresh Sadashiv

Vijaysingh Thorat

Adv. Pawar Suresh Sadashiv

Udaysingh Thorat

Adv. Pawar Suresh Sadashiv

Pratapsingh Thorat

Adv. Pawar Suresh Sadashiv

Shantaram Surywanshi

Adv. Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan

Laxman Aldar

Adv. Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita

07-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

17-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

15-11-2025

Evidence Part Heard

20-09-2025

Evidence Part Heard

02-08-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

07-03-2022
Order on Exhibit

The appeal filed by the respondents under Section 67 CPC is allowed and the previous order dismissing the case is set aside. The plaintiff's claim for partition and division of property against the defendant is upheld, and the defendant is directed to file a fresh response to enable proper adjudication of the case on merits. The matter is remitted back to the original court for continuation of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The appeal filed by the respondents under Section 67 CPC is allowed and the previous order dismissing the case is set aside. The plaintiff's claim for partition and division of property against the defendant is upheld, and the defendant is directed to file a fresh response to enable proper adjudication of the case on merits. The matter is remitted back to the original court for continuation of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division Vita All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case