Shri Pranay Chandrakant Devkar vs Chandrakant Parshuram Devkar - 14 Advocate - Salunkhe Rajaram Balasaheb — 499/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 0. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN150052492020

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2437/2020

Filing Date

15-12-2020

Registration No

499/2020

Registration Date

15-12-2020

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Vita

Judge

2-Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 0

Petitioner(s)

Shri Pranay Chandrakant Devkar

Adv. Gosavi Vinod Gopal

Respondent(s)

Chandrakant Parshuram Devkar - 14 Advocate - Salunkhe Rajaram Balasaheb

Rajendra Devkar

Adv. Pawar Shourya Suresh

Manisha Patil

Mangal Patil(Legal Heir)

Sangita Kirdat

Eknath Devkar

Kamlabai Devkar

Shantaram Devkar

Sanjay Devkar

Vijay Devkar

Raju Devkar

Santosh Devkar

Urmila Devkar

Suresh Devkar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita

07-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

16-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

05-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

08-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

05-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

03-10-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application filed by the plaintiff for permission to amend the plaint regarding the legal heirs of defendant No.6 (Eknath Dada Deokar, who died on 24.08.2018) was allowed in the interest of justice and equity. The court found that the legal heirs are necessary parties for fair adjudication and that no prejudice would be caused to defendants. The plaintiff is directed to file the amended plaint on record and serve a copy to the other side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application filed by the plaintiff for permission to amend the plaint regarding the legal heirs of defendant No.6 (Eknath Dada Deokar, who died on 24.08.2018) was allowed in the interest of justice and equity. The court found that the legal heirs are necessary parties for fair adjudication and that no prejudice would be caused to defendants. The plaintiff is directed to file the amended plaint on record and serve a copy to the other side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division Vita All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case