Mahesh Kadam etc.2 vs Pandurang Dhende Advocate - Pawar Himmatrao Akaram1. — 14/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26andord7R.1. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHSN150011552020
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
572/2020
Filing Date
09-12-2020
Registration No
14/2020
Registration Date
09-12-2020
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Vita
Judge
5-Civil Judge Senior Division, Vita
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahesh Kadam etc.2
Adv. Mane C D
Rahul Kadam
Adv. Kadam Vaibhav Vijayrao
Respondent(s)
Pandurang Dhende Advocate - Pawar Himmatrao Akaram1.
Drapadi Dhende(Legal Heir)
Adv. Pawar Himmatrao Akaram1.
Vidya Dhende
Adv. Pawar Himmatrao Akaram1.
Sharad Dhende(Legal Heir)
Adv. Pawar Himmatrao Akaram1.
Shekhar Dhnde
Adv. Pawar Himmatrao Akaram
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Civil Judge Senior Division, Vita
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 06-02-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 17-01-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 20-12-2025 | Defence Evidence | |
| 29-11-2025 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application (Exhibit 97) in Special Civil Suit No. 14/2020 and granted them permission to lead additional evidence in the present suit. The plaintiffs had inadvertently led evidence only for the present suit instead of for both clubbed suits (as per the 2015 order), and the defendants did not object to the additional evidence being led. The court found it just and proper to allow this to ensure fair adjudication on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application (Exhibit 97) in Special Civil Suit No. 14/2020 and granted them permission to lead additional evidence in the present suit. The plaintiffs had inadvertently led evidence only for the present suit instead of for both clubbed suits (as per the 2015 order), and the defendants did not object to the additional evidence being led. The court found it just and proper to allow this to ensure fair adjudication on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts