Babita Tukaram Kamble vs Nirmala Popat Gaikwad Advocate - Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan — 159/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1908. Status: Additional Issues. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN150010042023
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
745/2023
Filing Date
29-04-2023
Registration No
159/2023
Registration Date
03-05-2023
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Vita
Judge
3-2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Babita Tukaram Kamble
Adv. Pawar Himmatrao Akaram
Kalawati Hindurao Kamble
Adv. Pawar Himmatrao Akaram
Respondent(s)
Nirmala Popat Gaikwad Advocate - Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Popat Sitaram Gaikwad
Adv. Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Patangabai Hanmant Madake
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Additional Issues
Additional Issues
Additional Issues
Depositing Amount
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Additional Issues | |
| 03-01-2026 | Additional Issues | |
| 06-12-2025 | Additional Issues | |
| 04-10-2025 | Depositing Amount | |
| 30-08-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The application filed by defendants nos. 1 and 2 to set aside the "No Written Statement" order was allowed. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 on the defendants to be paid to the plaintiffs as penalty for the delay caused in filing their written statement, while permitting them to proceed with their defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The application filed by defendants nos. 1 and 2 to set aside the "No Written Statement" order was allowed. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 on the defendants to be paid to the plaintiffs as penalty for the delay caused in filing their written statement, while permitting them to proceed with their defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts