Maharashtra State Transport Corporation Mumbai vs Satish Kalidas Pujari and others Advocate - Kadam Vaibhav Vijayrao — 24/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN150008972020
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
449/2020
Filing Date
09-12-2020
Registration No
24/2020
Registration Date
09-12-2020
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Vita
Judge
5-Civil Judge Senior Division, Vita
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maharashtra State Transport Corporation Mumbai
Adv. Kudalkar Avinash Ramachandra
Respondent(s)
Satish Kalidas Pujari and others Advocate - Kadam Vaibhav Vijayrao
Manojkumar Kalidas Pujari
Adv. Kadam Vaibhav Vijayrao
Digambar Uttam Bhange
Adv. Kadam Vaibhav Vijayrao
Ambubai Shankar Saib
Sidheshwar Shankar Saib
Madhukar Ganpati Metkari
Indabai Shamrao Pukale
Subhash Ramchandra Chopade
Gokula Dattu Saib
Malan Dattu Saib
Chhaya Balu Saib
Anand Dattu Saib
Baburao Sadashiv Pujari
Gangaram Sadashiv Pujari
Arjun Gangadhar Pujari
Tahashildar Atpadi
Adv. Nikam S G
State of Maharashtra through Collector
Adv. Nikam S. G.
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Civil Judge Senior Division, Vita
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 31-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 27-11-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
The defendant and their counsel were called repeatedly at 3:40 PM but remained absent. The case was adjourned as the defendant did not appear and no application was filed on their behalf. The court ordered the proceedings to be postponed to a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The defendant and their counsel were called repeatedly at 3:40 PM but remained absent. The case was adjourned as the defendant did not appear and no application was filed on their behalf. The court ordered the proceedings to be postponed to a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts