Subhash Jagannath Shinde vs Baburao Jagannath Shinde Advocate - Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan — 176/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1908. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN150008792021
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
725/2021
Filing Date
05-07-2021
Registration No
176/2021
Registration Date
07-07-2021
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Vita
Judge
2-Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subhash Jagannath Shinde
Adv. Shalgaonkar Bharat Narayan
Respondent(s)
Baburao Jagannath Shinde Advocate - Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Rekha Sampat Babar Through Sampat Babaso Babar
Ranjana Ganpati Jadhav Through Baburao Jagannath Shinde
Kusum Jagannath Shinde
Omkar Baburao Shinde
Prathamesh Baburao Shinde
Adv. Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Dattaprasad Raghunath Shinde
Guruprasad Raghunath Shinde
Sadashiv Raghunath Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Amended Plaint
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 17-01-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 28-11-2025 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 15-11-2025 | Amended Plaint | |
| 01-11-2025 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Order Summary Petition Allowed. The plaintiff's application for amendment (Miscellaneous Petition No. 49) has been granted. The court directed the plaintiff to file corrections/amendments within the prescribed time period and serve a corrected copy on the defendant. The amendment was necessary because one of the defendants (Kusum Jagannath Shinde) had died on 08.09.2023, requiring her removal from the suit and substitution by her legal heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Order Summary Petition Allowed. The plaintiff's application for amendment (Miscellaneous Petition No. 49) has been granted. The court directed the plaintiff to file corrections/amendments within the prescribed time period and serve a corrected copy on the defendant. The amendment was necessary because one of the defendants (Kusum Jagannath Shinde) had died on 08.09.2023, requiring her removal from the suit and substitution by her legal heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts