Shriram Finance Limited vs SUSHANT ISHWAR JADHAV — 207/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R11. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Awaiting Notice Next hearing 16-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Arbitration R.D - Arbitration Execution Darkhast

CNR: MHSN150006302025

e-Filing Number

10-06-2025

Filing Number

683/2025

Filing Date

21-Jun-2025

Registration No

207/2025

Registration Date

21-Jun-2025

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Vita

Judge

5-Civil Judge Senior Division, Vita

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shriram Finance Limited

    Adv. Mane Vaibhav Jagannath

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSHANT ISHWAR JADHAV

  2. 2.ISHWAR RANGRAO JADHAV

  3. 3.ONKAR PRATAP KADAM

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Vita

  3. 06-Jan-2026

    Notice_Unready

    Jt Civil Judge Senior Division Vita

  4. 17-Oct-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Jt Civil Judge Senior Division Vita

  5. 19-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In Arbitration Regular Darkhast No.207/2025 between Shriram Finance Limited v/s Sushant Ishwar Jadhav-2, the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Vita issued an order on 19/07/2025 to issue notice against the J.D. (Judgment Debtor) vide Order 21 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The subsequent orders mark the documents as reviewed ("Seen") but contain no substantive additional directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 19-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 207/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Arbitration Regular Darkhast No.207/2025 between Shriram Finance Limited v/s Sushant Ishwar Jadhav-2, the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Vita issued an order on 19/07/2025 to issue notice against the J.D. (Judgment Debtor) vide Order 21 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The subsequent orders mark the documents as reviewed ("Seen") but contain no substantive additional directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case