Patangabai Hanmant Sawant vs Nirmala Popat Gaikwad Advocate - Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan — 369/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1908. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN150005832022
Filing Number
550/2022
Filing Date
04-May-2022
Registration No
369/2022
Registration Date
05-May-2022
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Vita
Judge
2-Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Patangabai Hanmant Sawant
Adv. Mahajan Madiwal Padmashree Avadhoot
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nirmala Popat Gaikwad Advocate - Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Case History
-
02-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
29-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
29-Mar-2025
Evidence
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
18-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
21-Sep-2024
Evidence
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
20-Jul-2024
Evidence
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
04-May-2024
Evidence
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
16-Mar-2024
Evidence
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
20-Jan-2024
Evidence
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
16-Dec-2023
Evidence
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
21-Oct-2023
Evidence
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
16-Sep-2023
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
15-Jul-2023
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
17-Jun-2023
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
15-Apr-2023
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
04-Mar-2023
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
21-Jan-2023
List of Witness
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
23-Dec-2022
Order on T.I.View PDF
Summary The petition is dismissed. The court found no grounds to interfere with the defendant's possession of the disputed property (land measuring 32×38 feet at Khanpur, Sangli district). The plaintiff failed to establish sufficient evidence of ownership rights and the court rejected the temporary injunction request, noting the defendant appears to be the lawful occupant. Court costs are pending final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Dec-2022
—
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
17-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
03-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
19-Nov-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
11-Nov-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
05-Nov-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
01-Oct-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
17-Sep-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
20-Aug-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
06-Aug-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
30-Jul-2022
Written Statement
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
13-Jul-2022
Written Statement
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
18-Jun-2022
Notice_Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
-
06-May-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 369/2022
Summary The petition is dismissed. The court found no grounds to interfere with the defendant's possession of the disputed property (land measuring 32×38 feet at Khanpur, Sangli district). The plaintiff failed to establish sufficient evidence of ownership rights and the court rejected the temporary injunction request, noting the defendant appears to be the lawful occupant. Court costs are pending final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts