Shriram Finance Limited vs Shivaji Gulab Yadav — 159/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Steps_Unready Next hearing 21-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Arbitration R.D - Arbitration Execution Darkhast

CNR: MHSN150005822025

e-Filing Number

29-03-2025

Filing Number

635/2025

Filing Date

21-Jun-2025

Registration No

159/2025

Registration Date

21-Jun-2025

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Vita

Judge

5-Civil Judge Senior Division, Vita

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shriram Finance Limited

    Adv. Gumaste Amit Arvind

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shivaji Gulab Yadav

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division, Vita

  3. 16-Dec-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Jt Civil Judge Senior Division Vita

  4. 29-Sep-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Jt Civil Judge Senior Division Vita

  5. 04-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In Arbitration Regular Darkhast No. 159/2025 between Shriram Finance Limited and Shivaji Gulab Yadav, the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Vita issued an order dated 04/07/2025 to issue notice against the Judgment Debtor (J.D.) under Order 21 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The subsequent orders indicate the court has reviewed the matter (marked as "Seen"). This appears to be a procedural order in an arbitration execution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 04-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 159/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Arbitration Regular Darkhast No. 159/2025 between Shriram Finance Limited and Shivaji Gulab Yadav, the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Vita issued an order dated 04/07/2025 to issue notice against the Judgment Debtor (J.D.) under Order 21 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The subsequent orders indicate the court has reviewed the matter (marked as "Seen"). This appears to be a procedural order in an arbitration execution case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case