Shubhangi Jayprakash Babar vs Subhash Aabaji Babar Advocate - Pingale Sambhaji Baburao — 29/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN150001192021
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
103/2021
Filing Date
24-01-2021
Registration No
29/2021
Registration Date
28-01-2021
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Vita
Judge
2-Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shubhangi Jayprakash Babar
Adv. Mhetre Amrut Dileep
Utkarsh Jaiprakash Babar Through Shubhangi Jaiprakash Babar
Adv. Patil Dharmendra Babanrao
Sakshi Jaiprakash Babar
Adv. Patil Dharmendra Babanrao
Respondent(s)
Subhash Aabaji Babar Advocate - Pingale Sambhaji Baburao
Lata Subhash Babar
Vishal Subhash Babar
Sayaji Aabaji Babar
Rajkumar Aabaji Babar
Chandrakant Aabaji Babar
Prabhawati Pandurang Chawan
Kasabai Aabaji Babar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 26-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 29-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 12-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 23-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 29/2021 (Shubhangi & Ors. v. Subhash & Ors.) The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to add Baban Suresh Babar as proposed defendant No. 9 in this partition and injunction suit. The amendment was deemed necessary because defendant No. 1 sold the suit property to the proposed defendant during the pendency of the case. The plaintiffs must file an amended plaint and serve copies to all other parties within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 29/2021 (Shubhangi & Ors. v. Subhash & Ors.) The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to add Baban Suresh Babar as proposed defendant No. 9 in this partition and injunction suit. The amendment was deemed necessary because defendant No. 1 sold the suit property to the proposed defendant during the pendency of the case. The plaintiffs must file an amended plaint and serve copies to all other parties within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts