Sushilabai Dattatray Lohar Pawar vs Yuvraj Gorakhnath Lohar Pawar Advocate - Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan — 27/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN150001172021
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
101/2021
Filing Date
24-01-2021
Registration No
27/2021
Registration Date
28-01-2021
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Vita
Judge
3-2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sushilabai Dattatray Lohar Pawar
Adv. Marle Abhijeet Subhash
Respondent(s)
Yuvraj Gorakhnath Lohar Pawar Advocate - Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Jalinder Gorakhnath Lohar Pawar
Adv. Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Chayaa Bhimrao Pawar
Adv. Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Maya Gorakhnath Lohar After Marriage Ganga Vishnu Navgan
Adv. Jadhav Santoshkumar Narayan
Shrirang Jagannath Devkar
Manjula Mahadev Pawar
Jagannath Mahadev Pawar
Premnath Mahadev Pawar
Aasha Raghunath Desai
Mahadev Jagannath Devkar
Shamrao Bhimrao Pawar
Kusum Sukhadev Devkar
Sarjerao Sukhadev Devkar
Nandakumar Sukhadev Devkar
Shalan Subhash Nikam
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr Dn JMFC Vita
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 06-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 21-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 23-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed defendant no.16's application to set aside the "No Written Statement" (W.S.) order, permitting her to file a written statement despite the delay. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 on the defendant to be paid to the plaintiffs as penalty for the delay caused in the civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed defendant no.16's application to set aside the "No Written Statement" (W.S.) order, permitting her to file a written statement despite the delay. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 on the defendant to be paid to the plaintiffs as penalty for the delay caused in the civil suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts