Akshay Baburao Patil vs Sunil Namdev Patil Advocate - Shevade Sachin Ashok — 154/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1908. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN140008352023
Filing Number
279/2023
Filing Date
12-Oct-2023
Registration No
154/2023
Registration Date
19-Oct-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
Last updated 13-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Akshay Baburao Patil
Adv. Kulkarni Avinash Govindrao
-
2.Gajanan Bhawan Patil
Adv. Kulkarni Avinash Govindrao
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sunil Namdev Patil Advocate - Shevade Sachin Ashok
Case History
-
29-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jun-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
25-Mar-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
11-Jul-2025
List of Witness
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
15-Apr-2025
Issues
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
15-Feb-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: RCS 154/2023 - Akshay Baburao Patil and Gajanan Bhawan Patil v. Sunil Namdev Patil Advocate The plaintiff's review petition challenging an earlier order rejecting his application for appointment of a Technical Land Level Recorder (TILLR) to measure disputed land parcels (gat nos. 509/2 and 509/3) at Sagaon was rejected. The court found the plaintiff failed to satisfy any grounds for review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC—no new evidence was discovered, no patent error appeared on the record, and merely withdrawing other pending applications did not constitute sufficient cause for review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Feb-2025
Issues
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
11-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
10-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
06-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
29-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
22-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
24-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
18-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
20-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
12-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
23-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
06-Apr-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
03-Apr-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
19-Mar-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
22-Feb-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
22-Feb-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
17-Feb-2024
Order on Exh
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
12-Feb-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
05-Feb-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
19-Jan-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
06-Jan-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
13-Dec-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
11-Dec-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
30-Nov-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
21-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 154/2023
Case Summary: RCS 154/2023 - Akshay Baburao Patil and Gajanan Bhawan Patil v. Sunil Namdev Patil Advocate The plaintiff's review petition challenging an earlier order rejecting his application for appointment of a Technical Land Level Recorder (TILLR) to measure disputed land parcels (gat nos. 509/2 and 509/3) at Sagaon was rejected. The court found the plaintiff failed to satisfy any grounds for review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC—no new evidence was discovered, no patent error appeared on the record, and merely withdrawing other pending applications did not constitute sufficient cause for review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts