Aarif Abbas Shahanediwan vs Shabbir Gulab Shahanediwan Advocate - Zole Patil Vilas Ganpati — 170/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34&38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN140008312025
e-Filing Number
13-11-2025
Filing Number
266/2025
Filing Date
14-Nov-2025
Registration No
170/2025
Registration Date
14-Nov-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Aarif Abbas Shahanediwan
Adv. Patel Ayyub Yusuf Dilshad
-
2.Salim Abbas Shahanediwan
Adv. PATEL AYYUB YUSUF DILSHAD
-
3.Minaj Salim Mulla
Adv. PATEL AYYUB YUSUF DILSHAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shabbir Gulab Shahanediwan Advocate - Zole Patil Vilas Ganpati
Case History
-
18-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
17-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
31-Jan-2026
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
03-Jan-2026
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
04-Dec-2025
W.S. and Say
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
18-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
In R.C.S. No. 170/2025 (Aarif Abbas Shahanediwan v. Shabbir Gulab Shahanediwan), the Civil Judge at Shirala issued summons to the defendant to file a written statement and for settlement of issues. Additionally, a show cause notice was issued to the defendant regarding why a temporary injunction should not be granted as prayed by the plaintiffs, since the plaintiffs' advocate was absent during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 170/2025
In R.C.S. No. 170/2025 (Aarif Abbas Shahanediwan v. Shabbir Gulab Shahanediwan), the Civil Judge at Shirala issued summons to the defendant to file a written statement and for settlement of issues. Additionally, a show cause notice was issued to the defendant regarding why a temporary injunction should not be granted as prayed by the plaintiffs, since the plaintiffs' advocate was absent during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts