Ganpat Chokha Satpute(Legal Heir) vs Pandurang Chokha Satpute — 3/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1908. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN140007802023
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
Filing Number
264/2023
Filing Date
07-09-2023
Registration No
3/2024
Registration Date
09-01-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. SHIRALA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganpat Chokha Satpute(Legal Heir)
Adv. Patil Thorat Pranavaditya Bharat1.
Vijay Ganpat Satpute
Adv. Thorat B P
Respondent(s)
Pandurang Chokha Satpute
Nana Chokha Satpute
Ganpat Chokha Satpute(Legal Heir)
Vandana Ganpat Satpute
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. SHIRALA
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 10-02-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 15-12-2025 | Amended Plaint |
| 26-11-2025 | Amended Plaint |
| 13-10-2025 | Amended Plaint |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition (Civil Application No. 3/2024) filed by Ganpat Satpute against Pandurang Satpute was allowed with conditions. The court directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 300/- as cost to the respondent. The petition sought to add the legal heirs of the deceased respondent (Respondent No. 1) to the original suit on the ground that there was an abatement order, and the court found merit in adding the heirs to proceed with the case on its merits while imposing cost as compensation for the delay caused by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition (Civil Application No. 3/2024) filed by Ganpat Satpute against Pandurang Satpute was allowed with conditions. The court directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 300/- as cost to the respondent. The petition sought to add the legal heirs of the deceased respondent (Respondent No. 1) to the original suit on the ground that there was an abatement order, and the court found merit in adding the heirs to proceed with the case on its merits while imposing cost as compensation for the delay caused by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts