Shri Datta Nagari Sahakari Pats Mar Branch Sagaon Tal Shirala Dist Sangli vs Sunil Vilas Gosavi — 399/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section Sec138. Status: Summons_Ready. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Summons_Ready Next hearing 17-Apr-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN140007382025

e-Filing Number

29-09-2025

Filing Number

537/2025

Filing Date

01-Oct-2025

Registration No

399/2025

Registration Date

03-Oct-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section Sec138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri Datta Nagari Sahakari Pats Mar Branch Sagaon Tal Shirala Dist Sangli

    Adv. Deshpande Bhushan Bhalchandra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Vilas Gosavi

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Summons_Ready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  3. 02-Feb-2026

    Summons_Ready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  4. 17-Dec-2025

    Summons_Ready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  5. 06-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: The court took cognizance and issued process against the accused Sunil Vilas Gosavi for cheque bounce offence under Section 138 r/w Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding prima-facie case established. The accused is permitted to recall the complainant for cross-examination upon appearance, failing which the case will proceed for recording the accused's statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 06-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 01-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 399/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court took cognizance and issued process against the accused Sunil Vilas Gosavi for cheque bounce offence under Section 138 r/w Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding prima-facie case established. The accused is permitted to recall the complainant for cross-examination upon appearance, failing which the case will proceed for recording the accused's statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case