Rajaram Ganpati Patil etc 3 vs MD Vishswaro Naik Sah Sakhar Karkhana Ltd Yashwantnagar Advocate - Padalkar Madhukar Sadashiv — 130/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 30-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN140006402024

e-Filing Number

03-09-2024

Filing Number

210/2024

Filing Date

09-Sep-2024

Registration No

130/2024

Registration Date

09-Sep-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

Last updated 13-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajaram Ganpati Patil etc 3

    Adv. Patil Sangram Sarjerao

  2. 2.Shrirang Ganpati Patil

    Adv. Patil Sangram Sarjerao

  3. 3.Dadaso Ganpati Patil

    Adv. Patil Sangram Sarjerao

  4. 4.Babaso Ganpati Patil

    Adv. Patil Sangram Sarjerao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MD Vishswaro Naik Sah Sakhar Karkhana Ltd Yashwantnagar Advocate - Padalkar Madhukar Sadashiv

Case History

  1. 30-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  5. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  6. 21-Jul-2025

    IssuesView PDF

    Case Summary: 130/2024 Case: Civil Suit 130/2024 - Rajaram Ganpati Patil v. MD Vishswaro Naik Sah Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, Yashwantnagar Issues: Dispute concerning property ownership and possession. Petitioners claim rightful ownership and possession of property allegedly purchased without proper documentation from one Guru Patil and Babuji Patil. They contend the respondent is unlawfully obstructing their rightful possession and seek a permanent injunction against the respondent. Order: The case has been framed with 10 issues for adjudication, including questions on property ownership, validity of sale deed, wrongful obstruction of possession, and eligibility for permanent injunction. The court has fixed the matter for further proceedings on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 21-Jul-2025

    List of Witness

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  8. 17-Jun-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  9. 21-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  10. 07-Mar-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  11. 05-Feb-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  12. 08-Jan-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  13. 13-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  14. 13-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  15. 13-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 09-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 130/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 130/2024 Case: Civil Suit 130/2024 - Rajaram Ganpati Patil v. MD Vishswaro Naik Sah Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, Yashwantnagar Issues: Dispute concerning property ownership and possession. Petitioners claim rightful ownership and possession of property allegedly purchased without proper documentation from one Guru Patil and Babuji Patil. They contend the respondent is unlawfully obstructing their rightful possession and seek a permanent injunction against the respondent. Order: The case has been framed with 10 issues for adjudication, including questions on property ownership, validity of sale deed, wrongful obstruction of possession, and eligibility for permanent injunction. The court has fixed the matter for further proceedings on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case