Krushna Patil vs Ramchandra Patil etc Advocate - Patil Shivraj Narayan — 112/2017
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,22. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN140005472017
Filing Number
175/2017
Filing Date
14-Aug-2017
Registration No
112/2017
Registration Date
16-Aug-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
Last updated 13-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Krushna Patil
Adv. Patil Ganpati Lakhu
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramchandra Patil etc Advocate - Patil Shivraj Narayan
-
2.Sushila Sapkal
-
3.Sudhakar Sapkal
-
4.Sunil Sapkal
-
5.Namdeo Sapkal
-
6.Anubai Sapkal
-
7.Hirabai Daphale
-
8.Samabai Patil
-
9.Sujata Dinde
-
10.Sambhaji Sapkal
-
11.Mangal Sapkal
-
12.Pandurang Patil
-
13.Shripati Patil
-
14.Namdeo Patil
-
15.Laxman Patil
-
16.Tukaram Patil
-
17.Sakharam patil
-
18.Laxman Patil
-
19.Kalawati Patil
-
20.Akkatai Sapkal
-
21.Ananda Sapkal
-
22.Rajaram Sapkal
-
23.Kamal Mulik
-
24.Putalabai Sapkal
-
25.Tanaji Sapkal
-
26.Shivaji Sapkal
-
27.Sarjerao Sapkal
-
28.Shivaji Sapkal
-
29.Vikas Sapkal
-
30.Mahadeo Sapkal (Chougule)
-
31.Pandurang Sapkal (Chougule)
-
32.Vasant Sapkal
-
33.Ashok Patil
-
34.Tanubai patil
-
35.Tukaram patil
-
36.Raghunath Patil
-
37.Tanaji Patil
-
38.Gorakhanath Patil
-
39.Bhagubai Patil
-
40.Vitthal Patil
-
41.Rajaram Patil
-
42.Asha Patil
-
43.Sangita Patil
-
44.Hirabai Patil
-
45.Mangal Kesare
-
46.Usha Chavan
-
47.Sonabai Bhakare
-
48.Anjana Patil
-
49.Kamal Shetake
-
50.Tukaram Patil
-
51.Shankar Sapkal Chougule
-
52.Parubai Sapkal Chougule
-
53.Balabai Patil
-
54.Bapu Patil
-
55.Rajaram Patil
-
56.Shivaji Patil
-
57.Bhimrao Patil
-
58.Shankar Patil
-
59.Gojabai Patil
-
60.Ganapati Patil
-
61.Keshav Patil
-
62.Sarjerao Patil
-
63.Amit Patil
-
64.Rajendra Patil
-
65.Bajirao Patil
-
66.Ananda Patil
-
67.Ramchandra Patil
-
68.Indubai Jadhav
-
69.Balabai Korade
-
70.Chandrabai Jadhav
-
71.Lilabai Pavale
-
72.Vasant Patil
-
73.Savitri Patil
-
74.Suvrana Patil
-
75.Supriya Patil
-
76.Baburao Patil
-
77.Rangrao Patil
-
78.Gunga Patil
-
79.Sambhaji Patil
-
80.Anita Patil
-
81.Pravin Patil
-
82.INdubai Patil
-
83.Shashikala Patil
-
84.Kanchan Jadhav
-
85.Ananda Patil
-
86.Shankar Patil
-
87.Dilip Patil
-
88.HIrabai Patil
-
89.Kamalabai Pawale
-
90.Sunita Yesale
-
91.Anusaya Maske
-
92.Sunita Patil
-
93.Bajirao Patil(Redkar)
-
94.Santosh Patil (Redkar)
-
95.Dagdu Patil
-
96.Manger, Maharashtra state Krushi Gramin vikas Bank Ltd. Mumbai
Case History
-
22-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Jul-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
24-Jun-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
19-Jun-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
27-Apr-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
25-Mar-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
17-Feb-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
09-Jan-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
16-Dec-2025
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
21-Nov-2025
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
29-Oct-2025
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
29-Sep-2025
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
28-Aug-2025
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
19-Jul-2025
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
18-Jun-2025
Arguments
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
29-Apr-2025
Arguments
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
07-Mar-2025
Arguments
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
30-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
05-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
24-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
22-Aug-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
27-Jun-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
04-May-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
12-Apr-2024
Dismissal Order
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
27-Feb-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
19-Jan-2024
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
13-Dec-2023
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
02-Nov-2023
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
07-Oct-2023
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
11-Sep-2023
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
24-Aug-2023
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
01-Aug-2023
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
04-Jul-2023
Evidence
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
04-May-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
19-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
13-Mar-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
14-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
13-Jan-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
20-Dec-2022
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: Krushna Patil v. Ramchandra Patil (RCS 112/2017) The court allowed the temporary injunction application. Krushna Patil sought to restrain Ramchandra Patil from obstructing his possession and alienating ancestral properties that had been partitioned between them. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case with supporting documentary evidence (7/12 land extracts, partition deed from 1989, and account records), balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. Defendant failed to file a response. The court ordered Defendant No. 1 temporarily restrained from obstructing plaintiff's possession over the suit property in any manner until final suit decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Dec-2022
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
12-Nov-2022
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
18-Oct-2022
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
19-Sep-2022
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
12-Aug-2022
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
02-Jul-2022
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
16-Jun-2022
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
11-Apr-2022
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
10-Mar-2022
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
17-Jan-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
29-Nov-2021
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
07-Oct-2021
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
16-Aug-2021
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
28-Jun-2021
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
07-May-2021
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
20-Mar-2021
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
05-Feb-2021
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
17-Dec-2020
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
26-Oct-2020
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
06-Aug-2020
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
17-Jun-2020
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
02-Jun-2020
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
20-May-2020
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
06-May-2020
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
17-Apr-2020
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
18-Feb-2020
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
04-Jan-2020
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
22-Nov-2019
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
05-Oct-2019
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
23-Aug-2019
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
29-Jul-2019
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
05-Jul-2019
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
30-Apr-2019
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
15-Feb-2019
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
22-Nov-2018
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
05-Oct-2018
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
25-Jul-2018
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
06-Jun-2018
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
17-Mar-2018
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
18-Jan-2018
Steps
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
28-Nov-2017
Awaiting Notice
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
15-Sep-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2017
Case Summary: Krushna Patil v. Ramchandra Patil (RCS 112/2017) The court allowed the temporary injunction application. Krushna Patil sought to restrain Ramchandra Patil from obstructing his possession and alienating ancestral properties that had been partitioned between them. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case with supporting documentary evidence (7/12 land extracts, partition deed from 1989, and account records), balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. Defendant failed to file a response. The court ordered Defendant No. 1 temporarily restrained from obstructing plaintiff's possession over the suit property in any manner until final suit decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts