Shree Jyotirling Sah Pat Ltd Mumbai Branch Shirala Tal Shirala Dist Sangli vs Vaibhav Raghunath Patil — 302/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Lok-Nyayalaya. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN140005362025
e-Filing Number
16-07-2025
Filing Number
410/2025
Filing Date
22-Jul-2025
Registration No
302/2025
Registration Date
23-Jul-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
Last updated 13-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shree Jyotirling Sah Pat Ltd Mumbai Branch Shirala Tal Shirala Dist Sangli
Adv. Shevade Sachin Ashok
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vaibhav Raghunath Patil
Case History
-
18-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jul-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
09-Jun-2026
Summons_Ready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
25-Mar-2026
Summons_Ready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
11-Feb-2026
Summons_Ready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
09-Jan-2026
Summons_Ready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
12-Nov-2025
Summons_Ready
C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala
-
17-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 302/2025 Summary: The court found prima facie case and issued process against accused Vaibhav Raghunath Patil under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for allegedly issuing a cheque in favor of complainant Shree Jyotirling Sah Pat Ltd for legal liability and debt without sufficient funds. The accused may recall the complainant for cross-examination upon appearance, failing which the case will proceed to recording the accused's statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 302/2025
Case 302/2025 Summary: The court found prima facie case and issued process against accused Vaibhav Raghunath Patil under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for allegedly issuing a cheque in favor of complainant Shree Jyotirling Sah Pat Ltd for legal liability and debt without sufficient funds. The accused may recall the complainant for cross-examination upon appearance, failing which the case will proceed to recording the accused's statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts