Vinay Surykant Pardeshi (Sonar) vs Rafiq Roshan Mulla — 17/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39,2A. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN140003492023
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
Filing Number
112/2023
Filing Date
06-04-2023
Registration No
17/2023
Registration Date
27-04-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. SHIRALA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinay Surykant Pardeshi (Sonar)
Adv. Pardeshi Suraj Tulsidas
Respondent(s)
Rafiq Roshan Mulla
Alfaj Rafiq Mulla
Alvina Rafiq Mulla
Rubina Rafiq Mulla
Dineshshing Babusing Pardeshi
Jayashri Shivsing Pardeshi
Sridhar Shivsing Pardeshi
Shivani Surykant Pardeshi
Arvind Rangrao Patil
Kishor Ramchandra Yadav
Sagar Dinkar Rankhambe
Annaso Pandurang Gaikwad
Deputy supdt Land Record Shirala
Mandal Officer Shirala
Gavkamgar Talathi Shirala
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. SHIRALA
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 10-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 07-08-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Civil M.A. No. 17/2023 (Vinay vs. Rafiq & ors.), the court noted that respondents 13-15 (Deputy Superintendent of land record, Circle Officer, and Talathi) were not original parties to the suit but were added to this application challenging their official acts. The court held that the maintainability of the application against these public servants must first be determined before proceeding further. The matter was adjourned pending determination of maintainability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Civil M.A. No. 17/2023 (Vinay vs. Rafiq & ors.), the court noted that respondents 13-15 (Deputy Superintendent of land record, Circle Officer, and Talathi) were not original parties to the suit but were added to this application challenging their official acts. The court held that the maintainability of the application against these public servants must first be determined before proceeding further. The matter was adjourned pending determination of maintainability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts