Pandurang Shamrao Phadtare Deceased(Legal Heir) vs Dropadi Sadashiv Patil Advocate - Sawant Kishor Sadashiv — 12/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 08-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN140000572026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

24/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pandurang Shamrao Phadtare Deceased(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Suryawanshi Narendra Tanajirao1.

  2. 2.Krushana Pandurang Phadtre

    Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi1.

  3. 3.Maruti Pandurang Phadtare

    Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi1.

  4. 4.Sunita Rajkumar Alias Rajendra Shinde

    Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi1.

  5. 5.Sangita Jagannath Sapkal

    Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi1.

  6. 6.Savitri Pandurang Phadtare

    Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dropadi Sadashiv Patil Advocate - Sawant Kishor Sadashiv

  2. 2.Aananda Shamrao Phadtare

  3. 3.Shalan Vasant Shinde

  4. 4.Hirabai Kisan Phadtare Deceased 4.

  5. 5.Tarabai Yashwant Suryawanshi 4.

  6. 6.Parvati Dnayndev Desai 4.

  7. 7.Hausabai Aanada Mohite

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the defendant's application seeking to frame a preliminary issue of res-judicata under Section 11 CPC. The court held that since the case involves mixed questions of fact and law requiring detailed evidence—particularly regarding whether the defendant concealed the death of the plaintiff's predecessor (Pandurang) and obtained an ex-parte decree without adding legal heirs—the res-judicata plea cannot be decided as a preliminary issue and must be determined during final trial. The application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  8. 28-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  13. 31-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  14. 31-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  15. 30-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  16. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the defendant's application seeking to frame a preliminary issue of res-judicata under Section 11 CPC. The court held that since the case involves mixed questions of fact and law requiring detailed evidence—particularly regarding whether the defendant concealed the death of the plaintiff's predecessor (Pandurang) and obtained an ex-parte decree without adding legal heirs—the res-judicata plea cannot be decided as a preliminary issue and must be determined during final trial. The application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case