Pandurang Shamrao Phadtare Deceased(Legal Heir) vs Dropadi Sadashiv Patil Advocate - Sawant Kishor Sadashiv — 12/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN140000572026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

24/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. SHIRALA

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Pandurang Shamrao Phadtare Deceased(Legal Heir)

Adv. Suryawanshi Narendra Tanajirao1.

Krushana Pandurang Phadtre

Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi1.

Maruti Pandurang Phadtare

Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi1.

Sunita Rajkumar Alias Rajendra Shinde

Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi1.

Sangita Jagannath Sapkal

Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi1.

Savitri Pandurang Phadtare

Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi

Respondent(s)

Dropadi Sadashiv Patil Advocate - Sawant Kishor Sadashiv

Aananda Shamrao Phadtare

Shalan Vasant Shinde

Hirabai Kisan Phadtare Deceased 4.

Tarabai Yashwant Suryawanshi 4.

Parvati Dnayndev Desai 4.

Hausabai Aanada Mohite

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. SHIRALA

04-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

30-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

25-03-2026

Order on Exh

17-03-2026

Order on Exh

07-03-2026

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

30-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the defendant's application seeking to frame a preliminary issue of res-judicata under Section 11 CPC. The court held that since the case involves mixed questions of fact and law requiring detailed evidence—particularly regarding whether the defendant concealed the death of the plaintiff's predecessor (Pandurang) and obtained an ex-parte decree without adding legal heirs—the res-judicata plea cannot be decided as a preliminary issue and must be determined during final trial. The application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the defendant's application seeking to frame a preliminary issue of res-judicata under Section 11 CPC. The court held that since the case involves mixed questions of fact and law requiring detailed evidence—particularly regarding whether the defendant concealed the death of the plaintiff's predecessor (Pandurang) and obtained an ex-parte decree without adding legal heirs—the res-judicata plea cannot be decided as a preliminary issue and must be determined during final trial. The application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case