Pandurang Shamrao Phadtare Deceased(Legal Heir) vs Dropadi Sadashiv Patil Advocate - Sawant Kishor Sadashiv — 12/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN140000572026
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
24/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
12/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. SHIRALA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandurang Shamrao Phadtare Deceased(Legal Heir)
Adv. Suryawanshi Narendra Tanajirao1.
Krushana Pandurang Phadtre
Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi1.
Maruti Pandurang Phadtare
Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi1.
Sunita Rajkumar Alias Rajendra Shinde
Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi1.
Sangita Jagannath Sapkal
Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi1.
Savitri Pandurang Phadtare
Adv. Narendra Suryawanshi
Respondent(s)
Dropadi Sadashiv Patil Advocate - Sawant Kishor Sadashiv
Aananda Shamrao Phadtare
Shalan Vasant Shinde
Hirabai Kisan Phadtare Deceased 4.
Tarabai Yashwant Suryawanshi 4.
Parvati Dnayndev Desai 4.
Hausabai Aanada Mohite
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. SHIRALA
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 30-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 17-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 07-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the defendant's application seeking to frame a preliminary issue of res-judicata under Section 11 CPC. The court held that since the case involves mixed questions of fact and law requiring detailed evidence—particularly regarding whether the defendant concealed the death of the plaintiff's predecessor (Pandurang) and obtained an ex-parte decree without adding legal heirs—the res-judicata plea cannot be decided as a preliminary issue and must be determined during final trial. The application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Civil Judge rejected the defendant's application seeking to frame a preliminary issue of res-judicata under Section 11 CPC. The court held that since the case involves mixed questions of fact and law requiring detailed evidence—particularly regarding whether the defendant concealed the death of the plaintiff's predecessor (Pandurang) and obtained an ex-parte decree without adding legal heirs—the res-judicata plea cannot be decided as a preliminary issue and must be determined during final trial. The application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts