Pandurang Shivram Hirvadekar vs Sarika Sunil Nangare — 16/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th August 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 25-Aug-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN140000482023

Filing Number

12/2023

Filing Date

12-Jan-2023

Registration No

16/2023

Registration Date

12-Jan-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Shirala

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

Last updated 13-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pandurang Shivram Hirvadekar

    Adv. Patil Shivraj Narayan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sarika Sunil Nangare

  2. 2.Sunil Rajaram Nangare

  3. 3.Laxman Akaram Hirvadekar

  4. 4.Rajendra Balaso Hiravadekar

  5. 5.Suresh Balaso Hiravadekar

  6. 6.Indubai Balaso Hiravadekar

  7. 7.Avinash Ramchandra Patil

Case History

  1. 25-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  5. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  6. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  7. 21-Jul-2025

    List of Witness

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  8. 24-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  9. 06-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  10. 16-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  11. 12-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  12. 04-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  13. 25-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  14. 04-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  15. 17-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  16. 28-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  17. 12-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  18. 11-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  19. 31-Aug-2023

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  20. 13-Jul-2023

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  21. 16-Jun-2023

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  22. 28-Apr-2023

    Issues

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  23. 27-Mar-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  24. 06-Mar-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Petitioner Pandurang Hirvadekar's application for temporary injunction against defendants Sarika Sunil Nangare and Sunil Rajaram Nangare seeking to restrain construction on disputed ancestral property was rejected. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience did not favor him, and no irreparable loss would result. The previously granted status-quo was vacated, allowing defendants to proceed with construction on property (City Survey No. 763/2) they purchased via registered sale-deed dated 25.10.1988. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  25. 06-Mar-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  26. 01-Mar-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  27. 17-Feb-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  28. 15-Feb-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  29. 30-Jan-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  30. 25-Jan-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  31. 23-Jan-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  32. 18-Jan-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  33. 13-Jan-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Shirala

  34. 12-Jan-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 12-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Petitioner Pandurang Hirvadekar's application for temporary injunction against defendants Sarika Sunil Nangare and Sunil Rajaram Nangare seeking to restrain construction on disputed ancestral property was rejected. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience did not favor him, and no irreparable loss would result. The previously granted status-quo was vacated, allowing defendants to proceed with construction on property (City Survey No. 763/2) they purchased via registered sale-deed dated 25.10.1988. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case