State of Maharashtra vs Aatmaram Gorakh Sathe Advocate - Patil Sunil Parasharam — 109/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 15th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN130008302023
Filing Number
468/2023
Filing Date
07-Sep-2023
Registration No
109/2023
Registration Date
08-Sep-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Kadegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 13-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
91
Police Station
Chinchani Wangi
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. Awale Abhijeet Dilip
Respondent(s)
-
1.Aatmaram Gorakh Sathe Advocate - Patil Sunil Parasharam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 109/2023 Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate at Kadegaon acquitted the accused, Aatmaram Gorakh Sathe, of all charges under IPC Sections 324, 323, 504, and 506 on April 15, 2026. Key Reasoning: Although the prosecution presented four eyewitness testimonies (the complainant Nilam and three family members) alleging the accused struck the complainant with a wooden stick and subsequently assaulted the witnesses while abusing and threatening them, the court found critical inconsistencies. Specifically, significant discrepancies existed between the complainant's First Information Report and courtroom testimony, and the prosecution failed to establish a solid, reliable evidentiary foundation to conclusively prove the accusations despite witness accounts. The court determined the evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
30-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
25-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
16-Mar-2026
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
10-Mar-2026
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
02-Mar-2026
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
09-Feb-2026
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
02-Feb-2026
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
19-Jan-2026
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
18-Nov-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
15-Sep-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
15-Sep-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
04-Sep-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
31-Jul-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
30-May-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
08-Apr-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
12-Mar-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
22-Jan-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
26-Nov-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
07-Oct-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
05-Aug-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
20-Jun-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
22-Jan-2024
Filing of Surety
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
22-Dec-2023
Filing of Surety
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
21-Nov-2023
Filing of Surety
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
-
25-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 109/2023
Case Summary: 109/2023 Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate at Kadegaon acquitted the accused, Aatmaram Gorakh Sathe, of all charges under IPC Sections 324, 323, 504, and 506 on April 15, 2026. Key Reasoning: Although the prosecution presented four eyewitness testimonies (the complainant Nilam and three family members) alleging the accused struck the complainant with a wooden stick and subsequently assaulted the witnesses while abusing and threatening them, the court found critical inconsistencies. Specifically, significant discrepancies existed between the complainant's First Information Report and courtroom testimony, and the prosecution failed to establish a solid, reliable evidentiary foundation to conclusively prove the accusations despite witness accounts. The court determined the evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts