Laxman Patil vs Dinkar Patil Advocate - Jitendra P Shinde — 178/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN130006922020
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
Filing Number
235/2020
Filing Date
09-11-2020
Registration No
178/2020
Registration Date
03-12-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Kadegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxman Patil
Adv. Jadhav P.S
Respondent(s)
Dinkar Patil Advocate - Jitendra P Shinde
Hirabai Ghadage
Shantabai Kadam
Shobhatai Kadam
Khashabai Patil
Nandkumar Patil
Ranjana Suryawanshi
Archana Patil
Sharad Patil(Legal Heir)
Anna Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 07-03-2026 | Issues |
| 17-01-2026 | Issues |
| 02-01-2026 | Issues |
| 22-12-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary The court granted the plaintiff's interim injunction petition with costs. Defendants 1 and 6 are restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's possession of the disputed agricultural property (located in Sangli District, Maharashtra) and from damaging the plaintiff's crops, which defendants were allegedly destroying with tractors. The court found that justice and balance of convenience favor the plaintiff, who has a legitimate interest in protecting his share of the inherited ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted the plaintiff's interim injunction petition with costs. Defendants 1 and 6 are restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's possession of the disputed agricultural property (located in Sangli District, Maharashtra) and from damaging the plaintiff's crops, which defendants were allegedly destroying with tractors. The court found that justice and balance of convenience favor the plaintiff, who has a legitimate interest in protecting his share of the inherited ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts