Jakir Ismail Mulla vs State — 43/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 09th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHSN130004742025
e-Filing Number
10-07-2025
Filing Number
320/2025
Filing Date
10-07-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
10-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Kadegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
88
Police Station
Chinchani Wangi
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jakir Ismail Mulla
Adv. Uthale Kiran Ramchandra
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
Disposed
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 04-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court allowed Jakir Ismail Mulla's application for interim custody of a seized tipper vehicle under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Finding the applicant to be the registered owner facing irreparable loss from non-use, the court granted custody subject to a ₹30 lakh supurtnama bond and strict conditions including non-alienation of the vehicle, prohibition on alterations, and mandatory production before authorities as required. The applicant must also provide photographs for identification purposes to secure the vehicle as evidence for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed Jakir Ismail Mulla's application for interim custody of a seized tipper vehicle under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Finding the applicant to be the registered owner facing irreparable loss from non-use, the court granted custody subject to a ₹30 lakh supurtnama bond and strict conditions including non-alienation of the vehicle, prohibition on alterations, and mandatory production before authorities as required. The applicant must also provide photographs for identification purposes to secure the vehicle as evidence for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts