Prakash Bhagawan Pawar and other 3 vs Balwant Mahadev Bhosale and other7 Advocate - Uthale Kiran Ramchandra — 100/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Ex-Parte Order. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHSN130003862021
Next Hearing
04th July 2026
Filing Number
172/2021
Filing Date
22-06-2021
Registration No
100/2021
Registration Date
22-06-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Kadegaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prakash Bhagawan Pawar and other 3
Adv. Hajare Gorakhnath Pandurang
Abaso Bhagwan pawar
Sandiip Shivaji Pawar
Sachin Shivaji Pawar
Respondent(s)
Balwant Mahadev Bhosale and other7 Advocate - Uthale Kiran Ramchandra
Namdev Raghunath Karande
Hemant Namdev Karande
Suhas Namdev Karande
Ananda Dhondiram Mandve
Pratibha Sambhaji Pawar
Priti Sambhaji Pawar Apak Pratibha Sambhaji Pawar
Hanmantrao Dhondiram Mandve
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC. Kadegaon
Ex-Parte Order
Ex-Parte Order
Ex-Parte Order
Ex-Parte Order
Ex-Parte Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 03-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 28-10-2025 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 19-08-2025 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 24-06-2025 | Ex-Parte Order |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Civil Suit No. 100/2021, Kadegaon Court, Sangli District Outcome: The court granted the interim relief petition (Nishaani 5) filed by the plaintiffs. The court ordered that defendants 1-4 are immediately restrained from transferring, modifying, or dispossessing the plaintiffs from their agricultural property that was partially acquired for the Tembu Upsa Irrigation Project. The court found that only the plaintiffs' share of the property was legitimately acquired for the project, and defendants cannot be allowed to reallocate or evict plaintiffs from their remaining lawful portion of the inherited ancestral land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Civil Suit No. 100/2021, Kadegaon Court, Sangli District Outcome: The court granted the interim relief petition (Nishaani 5) filed by the plaintiffs. The court ordered that defendants 1-4 are immediately restrained from transferring, modifying, or dispossessing the plaintiffs from their agricultural property that was partially acquired for the Tembu Upsa Irrigation Project. The court found that only the plaintiffs' share of the property was legitimately acquired for the project, and defendants cannot be allowed to reallocate or evict plaintiffs from their remaining lawful portion of the inherited ancestral land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts