State of Maharashtra Excis Departmen vs Lahu Dagadu Kamble — 599/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 27th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN120010562025

Case disposed

Filing Number

840/2025

Filing Date

10-12-2025

Registration No

599/2025

Registration Date

10-12-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Palus

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Excis Departmen

Adv. Changan Ravindra Ramdas

Respondent(s)

Lahu Dagadu Kamble

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus

27-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Arguments

03-02-2026

Hearing

10-12-2025

Filing of Surety

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court acquitted the defendant, Lahu Dargud Kamble, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he was illegally possessing and selling country liquor. The court noted critical procedural lapses including the absence of proper panchnama (seizure documentation) and lack of credible witness testimony, leading to reasonable doubt about the seizure itself. The defendant was ordered to be released, with seized liquor bottles to be disposed of through proper channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the defendant, Lahu Dargud Kamble, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), finding insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he was illegally possessing and selling country liquor. The court noted critical procedural lapses including the absence of proper panchnama (seizure documentation) and lack of credible witness testimony, leading to reasonable doubt about the seizure itself. The defendant was ordered to be released, with seized liquor bottles to be disposed of through proper channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division, Palus All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case