State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Ajit Dattu Chougule — 577/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHSN120010262025

Case disposed

Filing Number

811/2025

Filing Date

01-12-2025

Registration No

577/2025

Registration Date

01-12-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Palus

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Excise Department

Adv. Changan Ravindra Ramdas

Respondent(s)

Ajit Dattu Chougule

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus

01-04-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Arguments

16-02-2026

Plea / Particulars

01-12-2025

Plea / Particulars

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Palus Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Ajit Dattu Chougule of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession and sale of country liquor (Royal Satra brand), finding the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including the witness panchnama official's inability to corroborate key details and the absence of chemical analysis reports, scientific evidence, and other credible witnesses to substantiate the seizure proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Palus Judicial Magistrate acquitted defendant Ajit Dattu Chougule of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession and sale of country liquor (Royal Satra brand), finding the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps, including the witness panchnama official's inability to corroborate key details and the absence of chemical analysis reports, scientific evidence, and other credible witnesses to substantiate the seizure proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division, Palus All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case