State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Manik Devappa Sathe — 576/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN120010252025
Filing Number
810/2025
Filing Date
01-Dec-2025
Registration No
576/2025
Registration Date
01-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Palus
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 05-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Excise Department
Adv. Changan Ravindra Ramdas
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manik Devappa Sathe
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Palus First Class Magistrate Court acquitted accused Manik Devappa Sathe of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(e) for alleged illegal possession and sale of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized bottles were indeed illicit liquor, citing inadequate witness testimony, lack of chemical analysis reports, and procedural irregularities in the seizure documentation, thereby granting the accused full acquittal on April 1, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus
-
02-Mar-2026
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus
-
20-Feb-2026
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus
-
16-Feb-2026
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus
-
06-Jan-2026
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge Jr. Dn. J.m.f.c, Palus
-
01-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 576/2025
Court Decision Summary The Palus First Class Magistrate Court acquitted accused Manik Devappa Sathe of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(a)(e) for alleged illegal possession and sale of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized bottles were indeed illicit liquor, citing inadequate witness testimony, lack of chemical analysis reports, and procedural irregularities in the seizure documentation, thereby granting the accused full acquittal on April 1, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts