State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Ashwini Gorkah Madane — 550/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN120009922025
Filing Number
779/2025
Filing Date
20-11-2025
Registration No
550/2025
Registration Date
20-11-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Palus
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Excise Department
Adv. Changan Ravindra Ramdas
Respondent(s)
Ashwini Gorkah Madane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus
Disposed
Arguments
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 20-01-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 06-01-2026 | Filing of Surety |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Palus First Class Magistrate Court acquitted Ashwini Gorakh Madne of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 22 bottles of illegal liquor for sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole panchnama witness could not corroborate the seizure details and no chemical analysis report was submitted to confirm the seized substance was actually alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Palus First Class Magistrate Court acquitted Ashwini Gorakh Madne of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 22 bottles of illegal liquor for sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole panchnama witness could not corroborate the seizure details and no chemical analysis report was submitted to confirm the seized substance was actually alcohol. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts