State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Shivaji Vitthal Patil — 513/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 01st April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHSN120009122025
Filing Number
721/2025
Filing Date
14-10-2025
Registration No
513/2025
Registration Date
14-10-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Palus
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Excise Department
Adv. Changan Ravindra Ramdas
Respondent(s)
Shivaji Vitthal Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus
Disposed
Arguments
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 22-01-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 28-11-2025 | Filing of Surety |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted Shivaji Vitthal Pail of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession and sale of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized bottles constituted illicit liquor, as the panchnama (seizure document) witness testified inconsistently and the prosecution did not present sufficient corroborating evidence or chemical analysis reports to establish the guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted Shivaji Vitthal Pail of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession and sale of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized bottles constituted illicit liquor, as the panchnama (seizure document) witness testified inconsistently and the prosecution did not present sufficient corroborating evidence or chemical analysis reports to establish the guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts