Manisha Uttam Aoute vs Uttam Hindu Aoute — 55/2017

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHSN120004602017

Case disposed

Filing Number

123/2017

Filing Date

15-07-2017

Registration No

55/2017

Registration Date

17-07-2017

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Palus

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37,34
Hindu Succession Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

Manisha Uttam Aoute

Adv. Patil Suyog Subhash

Abhishek Uttam AouteRepresented by Guardian - Manisha Uttam Aoute

Adv. Patil Suyog Subhash

Mayuri Uttam AouteRepresented by Guardian - Aoute Manisha Uttam

Adv. Patil Suyog Subhash

Respondent(s)

Uttam Hindu Aoute

Salim Dastgir Shaikha

Shri. Satyavijay Sahakari Bank Ltd., Kundal Br. Palus

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR. DN. J.M.F.C, Palus

07-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

Dismissal Order

12-12-2025

Dismissal Order

29-09-2025

Dismissal Order

11-07-2025

Dismissal Order

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Civil Judge Junior Division at Palus dismissed Civil Suit No. 55/2017 (Manisha v. Uttam) in default under Order IX Rule 8 of the CPC on 07.03.2026 because the plaintiffs failed to lead evidence and did not appear for the hearing, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Any interim injunction previously granted in the case was vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Civil Judge Junior Division at Palus dismissed Civil Suit No. 55/2017 (Manisha v. Uttam) in default under Order IX Rule 8 of the CPC on 07.03.2026 because the plaintiffs failed to lead evidence and did not appear for the hearing, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Any interim injunction previously granted in the case was vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division, Palus All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case